Nick wrote: Hi Andy, I liked that! But I'm sure the neurologist though the kuraq was making it up and the concepts he was talking about did not exist. I don't doubt it!! What it represents for me is the huge gulf that exists between the two different types of thinking, and how it's almost impossible for them to be reconciled. But that doesn't mean to say that either of them is wrong, no matter what skeptical scientists and their lab experiments might have to say about the issue. In my opinion the true men of knowledge are not usually the scientists, and certainly not people like Andy and his ridiculous quackometer. The true men of knowledge are the shamans, seers, healers and mystics of this world who fearlessly push past the barriers between this world and others. They don't need to 'believe' in energy, healing, alternate realities and the soul. They KNOW these things exist because they interact with them everyday. They only laugh when scientists and sceptics try to tell them these things don't exist. And best of all, they have no desire or need to prove anything to anyone. However, I strongly believe that science will one day catch up with what shamans and mystics have known for thousands of years. In fact science is already catching up slowly. There are many scientists out there - real scientists - who truly have an open mind about what else might exist in this truly wonderous reality that we find ourselves in, and how it all works. A couple of good books to read about some of their research and findings are "The Field" by Lynne McTaggart, and "Holographic Universe" by Michael Talbot. Here's an article by Michael Talbot that summarizes some of what's in his book http://infiniteplaythemovie.com/universe_as_a_hologram.aspx "What we perceive as reality is only a canvas waiting for us to draw upon it any picture we want. Anything is possible, from bending spoons with the power of the mind to the phantasmagoric events experienced by Castaneda during his encounters with the Yaqui brujo don Juan, for magic is our birthright, no more or less miraculous than our ability to compute the reality we want when we are in our dreams. Indeed, even our most fundamental notions about reality become suspect, for in a holographic universe, as Pribram has pointed out, even random events would have to be seen as based on holographic principles and therefore determined. Synchronicities or meaningful coincidences suddenly makes sense, and everything in reality would have to be seen as a metaphor, for even the most haphazard events would express some underlying symmetry." - Michael Talbot Last edited: 18-03-2007 05:14:25 PM
Quote |